Vibe coding changed how fast an app gets built. You describe what you want, an AI tool writes it, and you have something clickable before lunch. Then you send it to a client, a co-founder or a few users, and the old problem is back: feedback arrives as screenshots, voice notes and long messages about a version that no longer exists.
This guide covers why feedback breaks when you build this fast, and a review loop that keeps up.
Why feedback breaks on vibe-coded apps
- The app changes faster than feedback arrives. A screenshot from this morning shows a layout you've rebuilt twice since.
- Previews live inside the builder. A prototype shown on Lovable's, v0's or Claude's own page is easy to look at, but there's nowhere on it to leave a comment.
- Feedback has to be retyped for the AI. “The button on the second card is off” means nothing to a prompt until someone works out which file and which element it is.
- Decisions get lost. When the next prompt rewrites a page, the reasons behind the last round go with it.
A review loop that keeps up
1. Put the app at a link people can review
There are two routes, depending on where the app lives.
- A single page or component from Claude, v0 or Lovable. Ask your agent to publish it to Skyelight. Skyelight hosts it at its own link with a review badge on it, so reviewers can comment in the browser. Publishing works on every plan, including Free. See hosted prototypes.
- A full app in your own repository. Lovable and Bolt build Vite apps and v0 builds Next.js apps, so once the code is in your repository you can add Skyelight Build with one command. Every preview deploy then carries the review badge.
2. Have reviewers pin comments on the page
Invite reviewers free and send them the link. They click the exact element they mean and write a comment. Each comment is pinned to that element, with the page and its context attached, so nobody has to describe where the problem is.
3. Hand the feedback to your coding agent
This is where vibe coding gets its speed back. Connect Claude Code, Cursor or Codex to the Skyelight MCP and ask it to work through the feedback. It reads each thread with the element and, with Skyelight Build, the source file and line, so it starts in the right place. It makes the fix, can open a pull request, and replies on the thread.
4. Check the fix on the page and resolve
The reviewer sees the reply where they left the comment. Check the change on the next preview and resolve the thread. When nothing is open, the round is done.