Inflight alternative
The Inflight alternative that follows the work to production
Inflight puts comments and video on prototypes and preview links. Skyelight pins feedback on any site, from the first preview to production, adds the source file and line behind each element, and lets Claude Code, Cursor or Codex fix it and reply. There's a free plan, and Pro starts at $29 a month.
Free plan. Reviewers are free on every plan.
Why teams switch from Inflight
A free plan, and cheaper from three seats
Inflight has a 14-day trial and no free plan, then $18 a member each month ($15 billed yearly). Skyelight has a free plan, and Pro is $29 a month with your seat included, plus $9 for each extra seat. A team of five pays $65 a month instead of $90.
The file and line, not just the page
Inflight gives your agent the page path and the pinned element. With Skyelight Build, every thread also carries the source file, line and commit behind the element, plus any console errors and failed requests from just before the pin.
Agents close the loop
Inflight's agent pulls the feedback and checks off next steps. Hand a Skyelight thread to your agent to investigate, plan or fix: it opens the right file, can open a pull request, and replies on the thread where the reviewer asked.
Skyelight vs Inflight
| Feature | Skyelight | Inflight |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes, 1 project | No, 14-day trial |
| Starting price | $29/mo, your seat included | $18 per member/mo ($15 yearly) |
| A team of five, billed monthly | $65/mo | $90/mo |
| Free clients and reviewers | Unlimited, every plan; guests with no account on Pro | Unlimited guests with no account |
| Feedback on any site, production included | Chrome extension | Script tag on each shared build |
| Source file and line on every thread | Yes, with Skyelight Build | Page path and pinned element |
| Console errors and failed requests | – | |
| MCP server for coding agents | ||
| Coding agent fixes it and replies on the thread | Investigate, plan or fix, with a PR | Pulls feedback, checks off next steps |
| Integrations | Slack, Linear and GitHub | Slack |
| Video feedback | – | Yes, with transcripts |
| Hosts standalone HTML prototypes | – |
Inflight details are from its own website, checked October 16, 2026. A dash means we found no mention of it there. Spotted something out of date? Email support@skyelight.ai.
When Inflight is the better choice
Inflight is the better fit if your reviews run on video walkthroughs, you share standalone HTML prototypes with no repository behind them, you're a team of one or two, or you need a SOC 2 Type 2 report today.
Skyelight and Inflight: common questions
Both pin feedback to elements and hand it to coding agents over MCP. Inflight is built around prototypes and preview links, with video at the center. Skyelight follows the work to production: the Chrome extension works on any site, and with Skyelight Build each thread carries the source file, line and commit, so the agent starts in the right place and replies on the thread when it's done.
From three seats, yes. Skyelight Pro is $29 a month including your seat, plus $9 for each extra seat, so five people pay $65 a month. Inflight is $18 a member each month, or $90 for five. For one or two people Inflight costs a little less, but Skyelight also has a free plan for one project.
Not on a paid plan, in either tool. On Skyelight Pro and Team, a project can take guest feedback: reviewers type their name and pin, with no account. On the free plan, reviewers sign up for a free reviewer account. Reviewers never take a paid seat in either tool.
No. Skyelight threads are written comments pinned to an element, with the page, the browser, recent errors and, if you turn them on, screenshots. If your team reviews mostly through recorded walkthroughs, Inflight does that well.